Said

(PC) O'Brien v. Said

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20201:18-cv-00741California2,011 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

KORY T. O’BRIEN, ) Case No.: 1:18-cv-00741-NONE-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S REQUEST v. ) FOR ISSUANCE OF SUBPOENAS DUCES

TECUM, WITHOUT PREJUDICE

) K. E. SAID, ) (ECF No. 53) Defendant. ) ) )

Plaintiff Kory T. O’Brien is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s request for issuance of subpoenas duces tecum, filed on July 16, 2020. Defendant filed an opposition on August 6, 2020. The Court deems the matter suitable for resolution without the filing of a reply by Plaintiff. Local Rule 230(l). I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This action is proceeding against Defendant Dr. El-Said for deliberate indifference to a serious medical need. Plaintiff alleges, in pertinent part, that Defendant Dr. El-Said knew…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.