Pfeiffer

(PC) Lamon v. Pfeiffer

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20201:20-cv-00896California572 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

BARRY LOUIS LAMON, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00896-AWI-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) ORDER REGARDING PLAINTIFF’S NOTICE v. ) TO PROCEED ON CLAIMS FOUND TO BE

COGNIZABLE

C. PFEIFFER, et.al., ) ) (ECF No. 13) Defendants. ) ) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff Barry Louis Lamon is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 19 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 On July 21, 2020, the undersigned screened Plaintiff’s complaint, found that Plaintiff stated 21 separate cognizable claims for retaliation against Defendants Jones, Moffett, Moore, Alvarez, Eaker, 22 Gonzalez, Rivera-Sierra, Ronquillo, Luna, Ramirez, Goss, Bennett-Beach and Velasco, separate 23 cognizable claims for failure to protect against Defendants Corona, Loera, Ramirez, Eaker, Luna, 24 Jones, Moffett, Moore, Alvarez, Ronquillo, Luna, Rivera-Sierra and Clare, a cognizable Bane Act 25 claim against Corona, Jones,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.