Vichai Vongsvirates v. Wells Fargo Bank N.A.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20201:20-cv-00474California515 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

VICHAI VONGSVIRATES, ) No. 1:20-cv-00474-NONE-JLT ) Plaintiff, ) ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND ) RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING PLAINTIFF’S v. ) MOTION TO PROCEED IN FORMA PAUPERIS ) AND DISMISSING THE ACTION WITHOUT WELLS FARGO BANK N.A., et al., ) PREJUDICE Defendants. ) ) (Doc. No. 12) )

Vichai Vongsvirates seeks to proceed pro se and in forma pauperis in this action against Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. and Rushmore Loan Management Services. On April 16, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge screened the complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915A(b) and/or 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2) and dismissed plaintiff’s initial complaint with leave to amend because plaintiff failed to allege facts sufficient to support his claims. (Doc. No. 7.) On May 6, 2020, plaintiff filed a first amended complaint. (Doc. No. 8.) However, the first amended complaint largely duplicated the initial filing, and the magistrate judge…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.