Pleshchuck
(PC) Harris v. Pleshchuck
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TEVIN LEE HARRIS, No. 2: 19-cv-1751 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER R. VALENCIA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s July 24, 2020 motion for a traverse. (ECF No. 40.) For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff’s motion for a traverse is denied. The only defendant in this action is R. Pleschuck, who is employed at California State Prison-Sacramento (“CSP-Sac”) as a “Phd.” Plaintiff alleges that defendant Pleschuck denied plaintiff adequate mental health care, in violation of the Eighth Amendment, while plaintiff was housed in CSP-Sac-A-2 PSU during 2018. Plaintiff is currently housed at the Los Angeles County Jail. On April 14, 2020, the undersigned referred this action to the Post-Screening ADR Project and stayed this action for 120 days. This action is set for a…