Pleshchuck

(PC) Harris v. Pleshchuck

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 7, 20202:19-cv-01751California724 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TEVIN LEE HARRIS, No. 2: 19-cv-1751 JAM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER R. VALENCIA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s July 24, 2020 motion for a traverse. (ECF No. 40.) For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff’s motion for a traverse is denied. The only defendant in this action is R. Pleschuck, who is employed at California State Prison-Sacramento (“CSP-Sac”) as a “Phd.” Plaintiff alleges that defendant Pleschuck denied plaintiff adequate mental health care, in violation of the Eighth Amendment, while plaintiff was housed in CSP-Sac-A-2 PSU during 2018. Plaintiff is currently housed at the Los Angeles County Jail. On April 14, 2020, the undersigned referred this action to the Post-Screening ADR Project and stayed this action for 120 days. This action is set for a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.