Diaz

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 11 RUDOLPH ELLIS, No. 1:20-cv-00134-NONE-EPG (PC) Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT PLAINTIFF’S

v. COMPLAINT BE DISMISSED FOR

FAILURE TO STATE A CLAIM

RALPH DIAZ, et al., (ECF NO. 9) Defendants.

OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

THIRTY (30) DAYS 18 Plaintiff Rudolph Ellis (“Plaintiff”) is a state inmate proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff commenced this action by filing petition for a writ of habeas corpus on January 27, 2020. (ECF No. 1). The Court ordered Plaintiff to reassert his claims under 42 U.S.C. § 1983 (ECF No. 8), and Plaintiff filed a first amended complaint under Section 1983 on May 1, 2020 (ECF No. 9). The Court has screened Plaintiff’s complaint and finds that it fails to state any cognizable claims. For the reasons that follow, the Court recommends that this case be…