King

(PC) Chester v. King

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20201:16-cv-01257California824 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

RAYMOND D. CHESTER, 1:16-cv-01257-DAD-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,

RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE

v. DISMISSED FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO

COMPLY WITH COURT’S ORDER

AUDREY KING, et al., (ECF No. 57.)

Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

18 I. BACKGROUND Raymond D. Chester (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 10, 2020, the court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to file an opposition or notice of non-opposition to the motion for summary judgment filed on August 19, 2019 by defendants Audrey King (Executive Director), Jagsir Sandhu, M.D. (Chief Medical Officer), and Robert Withrow, M.D. (Medical Director of Coalinga State Hospital) (collectively, “Defendants”), within thirty days (ECF No. 45.) The thirty day time period has expired and Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.