King
(PC) Chester v. King
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
RAYMOND D. CHESTER, 1:16-cv-01257-DAD-GSA-PC
Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS,
RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE
v. DISMISSED FOR PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE TO
COMPLY WITH COURT’S ORDER
AUDREY KING, et al., (ECF No. 57.)
Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN DAYS
18 I. BACKGROUND Raymond D. Chester (“Plaintiff”) is a civil detainee proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On June 10, 2020, the court issued an order requiring Plaintiff to file an opposition or notice of non-opposition to the motion for summary judgment filed on August 19, 2019 by defendants Audrey King (Executive Director), Jagsir Sandhu, M.D. (Chief Medical Officer), and Robert Withrow, M.D. (Medical Director of Coalinga State Hospital) (collectively, “Defendants”), within thirty days (ECF No. 45.) The thirty day time period has expired and Plaintiff has not filed an opposition or…