Emerson
(PC) Dillingham v. Emerson
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JERRY DILLINGHAM, Case No. 1:18-cv-00507-AWI-SAB (PC) 11 Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION OF THE v. COURT’S APRIL 2, 2020 ORDER
N. EMERSON, et al., [ECF No. 73]
14 Defendants. 15 Plaintiff Jerry Dillingham is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for reconsideration, filed on May 4, 2020. Plaintiff seeks reconsideration under Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 59(e) of the Court’s April 2, 2020 order denying his request for entry of default. The Court may grant reconsideration under Rule 59(e) or 60. See Schroeder v. McDonald, 55 F.3d 454, 458–59 (9th Cir. 1995). A motion to alter or amend a judgment under Rule 59(e) must be filed no later than 28 days after the entry of judgment. Fed. R. Civ. P. 59(e). Therefore, a “motion for reconsideration” is treated…