Seitz

(PC) Lipsey v. Seitz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20201:18-cv-00766California464 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHRISTOPHER LIPSEY, JR., No. 1:18-cv-00766-AWI-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S

v. MOTION FOR RECONSIDERATION

B. SEITZ, et al., (Doc. 52)

Defendants. 16 Plaintiff Christopher Lipsey, Jr., is a state prisoner appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States magistrate judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 17, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that Plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction (Doc. 30) be denied. (Doc. 35.) Plaintiff failed to file objections, and the Court adopted the findings and recommendations on June 26, 2020. (Doc. 46.) On August 3, 2020, Plaintiff filed a motion for reconsideration of the Court’s June 26, 2020 order. (Doc. 52.) Plaintiff argues that the magistrate judge erroneously relied on…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.