(SS) Davis v. Commissioner of Social Security

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20202:18-cv-02415California2,481 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 TERESA DIANE DAVIS, No. 2:18-cv-2415-WBS-KJN Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

ON PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR FEES

v. UNDER THE EAJA COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL (ECF No. 28.)

SECURITY,

15 Defendant. 16 Plaintiff filed a complaint against the Commissioner of Social Security concerning the ALJ’s denial of benefits. (ECF No. 1.) The action proceeded before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(15) for the entry of findings and recommendations. (See ECF Nos. 7, 9.) On March 25, 2020, the undersigned found that the ALJ failed to fully consider all of plaintiff’s alleged mental impairments. (ECF No. 25.) It was recommended the case be remanded for further administrative proceedings. (Id.) The district court adopted the findings and recommendations, entering judgment on April 4, 2020. (ECF Nos. 26, 27.) On July 12, 2020, plaintiff moved for attorney’s fees under the Equal Access to Justice Act (“EAJA”), 28…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.