Stewart

(PC) Mendez v. Stewart

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20202:19-cv-01810California408 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MARLENE MENDEZ, et al., No. 2:19-cv-1810 KJM CKD P Plaintiffs, v. ORDER STEWART, Defendant. 16 Plaintiff, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed this civil rights action seeking relief under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 8, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which recommended plaintiff Baker be required to pay the filing fee in full. (ECF No. 4.) Both plaintiffs were served with the findings and recommendations and both plaintiffs’ copies of the findings and recommendations were returned by the postal service as undeliverable. After both plaintiffs failed to file notices of change of address within the time provided by Local Rule 183(b), the magistrate judge filed additional findings and recommendations on June 30, 2020, recommending this action be dismissed without…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.