McLeod

(PS) Shook v. McLeod

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 10, 20202:20-cv-01146California358 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JEFFORY LYNN SHOOK, No. 2:20-cv-01146 JAM AC PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SAM McLEOD, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is proceeding in this action pro se. The action was accordingly referred to the undersigned for pretrial matters by E.D. Cal. R. (“Local Rule”) 302(c)(21). On June 17, 2020, the court declined to serve the complaint, and granted plaintiff 30 days to file an amended complaint. ECF No. 5. Plaintiff did not file an amended complaint. On July 22, 2020, the court ordered plaintiff to show cause within 14 days why this case should not be dismissed for failure to prosecute. ECF No. 6. Plaintiff was cautioned that failure to do so could lead to a recommendation that the action be dismissed. Plaintiff has not responded to the court’s orders, nor taken any action to prosecute this case. Therefore, IT IS HEREBY RECOMMENDED that this action be dismissed, without prejudice, for lack of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.