Sexton
(PC) Harris v. Sexton
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 EARNEST S. HARRIS, No. 1:18-cv-0080 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS SEXTON, et al., Defendant. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges use of the Guard One Security Check system at California State Prison-Corcoran (“CSP-Corcoran”) deprived him of sleep in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Before the court is plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order. (ECF No. 60.) For the reasons set forth below, this court will recommend plaintiff’s motion be denied. BACKGROUND This case is proceeding on plaintiff’s second amended complaint filed February 22, 2019. Plaintiff alleges defendants are responsible for the implementation and use of the Guard One Security Check system in the security housing unit at CSP-Corcoran. That system requires officers to…