Rough

Rough v. Costco Wholesale Corp.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20202:19-cv-01340California839 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MEGAN ROUGH, individually and on No. 2:19-cv-01340-MCE-DB behalf of all similarly situated current and former employees of Defendants in the State of California; ORDER Plaintiff, 14 v.

COSTCO WHOLESALE

CORPORATION, a Delaware Corporation; and DOES 1-50, inclusive, 17 Defendants.

19 Through this action, Plaintiff Megan Rough (“Plaintiff”) seeks relief from Defendant Costco Wholesale Corporation (“Defendant”) for violations of the California Labor Code and the Industrial Welfare Commission Wage Orders. Plaintiff, individually and on behalf of all other similarly situated employees, filed a Class Action Complaint in the Superior Court of California, County of Solano, after which Defendant removed the case to federal court pursuant to the Class Action Fairness Act (“CAFA”), 28 U.S.C. § 1332(d). ECF No. 1. The Court issued its Initial Pretrial Scheduling Order that same day and thereafter denied a Motion to Remand and a Motion to Change Venue. ECF Nos. 2, 14, 17. 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.