Santillan

(PC) Stanford v. Santillan

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20201:19-cv-01634California481 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

MICHAEL STANFORD, Case No. 1:19-cv-01634-JDP Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS

THAT THIS CASE BE DISMISSED FOR

v. FAILURE TO PROSECUTE, FAILURE TO

STATE A CLAIM, AND FAILURE TO

L. SANTILLAN, et al.,

COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER

Defendants.

OBJECTIONS DUE IN THIRTY DAYS

ORDER THAT THE CLERK’S OFFICE

ASSIGN THIS CASE TO A DISTRICT

JUDGE

16 17 Plaintiff Michael Stanford is a state prisoner proceeding without counsel in this civil rights action brought under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff’s complaint was screened on March 30, 2020. The court found that plaintiff failed to state a claim, and plaintiff was ordered to file a first amended complaint within sixty days. See ECF No. 10. Plaintiff did not do so. On June 17, 2020, we ordered that plaintiff show cause why his case should not be dismissed for failure to state a claim and failure to prosecute. ECF No. 11. Plaintiff has not responded. We thus recommend that…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.