Unknown

(HC) Colbourn v. Unknown

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20202:20-cv-00550California1,975 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ORRIN TYLER COLBOURN, No. 2:20-cv-0550 DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

UNKNOWN, Respondent. 16 Petitioner is a county inmate proceeding pro se with an application for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner claims his 2018 conviction and sentence in the Butte County Superior Court. For the reasons set forth below, the court will recommend that the petition be dismissed. IN FORMA PAUPERIS Petitioner has not filed an in forma pauperis affidavit or paid the required filing fee ($5.00). See 28 U.S.C. §§ 1914(a); 1915(a). However, because the court will recommend that the petition be summarily dismissed, the court will not require petitioner to submit an in forma pauperis application or pay the filing fee. //// //// //// SCREENING I. Legal Standards – Screening The court is required to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.