(PC) Gray v. Clark

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20201:20-cv-00196California954 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

THOMAS EUGENE GRAY, ) Case No.: 1:20-cv-00196-NONE-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION v. ) RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR EMERGENCY TRANSFER INJUNCTION

KEN CLARK, et.al., ) BE DENIED ) Defendants. ) [ECF No. 27] ) ) ) ) )

Plaintiff Thomas Eugene Gray is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights 19 action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. 20 Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion for an emergency transfer injunction, filed 21 August 10, 2020. (ECF No. 27.) 22 I. 23 DISCUSSION The purpose of a temporary restraining order or a preliminary injunction is to preserve the status quo if the balance of equities so heavily favors the moving party that justice requires the court to intervene to secure the positions until the merits of the action are ultimately determined. University of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.