(PC) Belmonte v. Smith

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20202:19-cv-00269California319 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 MIGUEL BELMONTE, No. 2:19-cv-0269 KJM AC P Plaintiff, v. ORDER A. SMITH, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a former state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights complaint filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff alleges the denial of his constitutional rights during his prior incarceration at Mule Creek State Prison. Plaintiff has filed a notice of address change indicating that he is no longer incarcerated. Therefore, he must complete and submit a non- prisoner application to proceed in forma pauperis on the form provided herewith. See e.g. Adler v. Gonzalez, 2015 WL 4041772, at *1, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 85909 (E.D. Cal. July 1, 2015), report and recommendation adopted, 2015 WL 4668668, 2015 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 103386 (E.D. Cal. Aug. 6, 2015) (payment of fee not required if plaintiff remains indigent after release from prison), and cases cited therein. Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that: …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.