Lizzaraga

(PC) Henderson v. Lizzaraga

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20202:18-cv-02181California783 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CURTIS LEE HENDERSON, SR., No. 2:18-CV-2181-JAM-DMC-P Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS JOE LIZZARAGA, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is plaintiff’s motion for confidential correspondence with incarcerated inmate witnesses and for location of witnesses. See ECF No. 70. Because plaintiff seeks an order compelling prison officials to take certain actions, the Court construes plaintiff’s motion as a motion for injunctive relief. / / / / / / / / /

The title of plaintiff’s motion references a request for “the location of witnesses.” 26 However, plaintiff does not explain what he means by this. Presumably, plaintiff is seeking the incarceration location for the listed inmate-witnesses in his motion. To the extent this is the case, such information is publicly available through the inmate…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.