Biter

(HC) Peterson v. Biter

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20202:16-cv-00251California417 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 KELVIN PETERSON, No. 2:16-cv-00251-TLN-DB Petitioner, v. ORDER MARTIN BITER, Respondent. 15 Petitioner is a state inmate proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On March 13, 2020, the magistrate judge assigned to this action issued findings and recommendations recommending that the petition be denied. (ECF No. 20.) The findings and recommendations were served on all parties and contained notice that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (Id.) On March 20, 2020, Petitioner requested additional time to file objections to the findings and recommendations due to the COVID-19 pandemic. (ECF No. 21.) Petitioner was given an additional sixty days to file any objections. (ECF No. 22.) Those sixty…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.