Chacko

Chacko v. AT&T Umbrella Benefit Plan No. 3

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 11, 20202:19-cv-01837California892 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RUBY CHACKO, No. 2:19-cv-1837 JAM DB Plaintiff, v. ORDER AT&T UMBRELLA BENEFIT PLAN

NO. 3,

15 Defendant. 17 On August 7, 2020, this matter came before the undersigned pursuant to Local Rule 302(c)(1) for hearing of plaintiff’s motion to compel. (ECF No. 41.) Attorney Michelle Roberts appeared via Zoom on behalf of plaintiff and attorney Stacey Campbell appeared via Zoom on behalf of defendant. Oral argument was heard and plaintiff’s motion was taken under submission. This matter was last before the undersigned on March 13, 2020, for hearing of a motion to compel brought by plaintiff. (ECF No. 29.) Plaintiff’s motion sought to compel discovery related to: (1) the completeness of the Administrative Record; (2) conflict-of-interest discovery concerning the relationship between the Plan and its third-party administrator, Sedgwick; and (3) conflict of interest discovery concerning a vendor and physician…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.