Contreras
Contreras v. Mote
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 8 KIM CONTRERAS, Case No. 1:20-cv-00366-SKO Plaintiff, ORDER TO SHOW CAUSE WHY THE v. ACTION SHOULD NOT BE DISMISSED CAROLINE MOTE, et al., FOR PLAINTIFFS’ FAILURE TO
COMPLY WITH THE COURT’S ORDER
Defendants. (Doc. 14)
TWENTY-ONE (21) DAY DEADLINE
15 On March 10, 2020, Plaintiff filed the complaint in this case against Defendants. (Doc. 1.) 16 On April 30, 2020, Defendants filed a motion to dismiss pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 12(b)(6). (Doc. 17 4.) On July 13, 2020, the Court granted Defendants’ motion to dismiss, granted Plaintiff leave to 18 file an amended complaint within 21 days of the date of service of the order, and warned Plaintiff 19 that failure to file an amended complaint would lead to dismissal of the case. (Doc. 20.) Plaintiff 20 failed to file an amended complaint by the deadline and has not responded to the Court’s order to 21 date. Due to Plaintiff’s pro se status, the ongoing coronavirus (COVID-19) pandemic and 22 associated…