Trujillo

Trujillo v. GH Food Mart, Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20201:20-cv-00368California5,580 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 JOSE TRUJILLO, Case No. 1:20-cv-00368-AWI-SKO 11 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS THAT v. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR DEFAULT JUDGMENT BE

GRANTED IN PART AND ORDER

GH FOOD MART, INC. dba COMPLETE VACATING HEARING CONVENIENCE CENTER, et al., (Doc. 12) Defendants. OBJECTIONS DUE: 21 DAYS _________________________________ _ / 17 I. INTRODUCTION 19 On July 13, 2020, Plaintiff Jose Trujillo (“Plaintiff”) filed a motion for default judgment 20 against Defendants GH Food Mart, Inc. dba Complete Convenience Center, Ranbir S. Bhatti, and 21 Harjit K. Bhatti (collectively “Defendants”). (Doc. 12.) No opposition to Plaintiff’s motion was 22 filed. The Court has reviewed the motion and supporting documentation and determines that the 23 matter is suitable for decision without oral argument pursuant to Local Rule 230(g).…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.