Santoro

(PC) Bush v. Santoro

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 12, 20201:20-cv-00015California542 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

8 JAMES S. BUSH, Case No. 1:20-cv-00015-NONE-EPG (PC) 9 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT CERTAIN v. CLAIMS AND DEFENDANTS BE DISMISSED

K. SANTORO, et al.,

(ECF NOS. 1 & 11) Defendants. OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN

FOURTEEN DAYS

14 James S. Bush (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on January 6, 2020. (ECF No. 1). The Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint. (ECF No. 11). The Court found that only the following claims should proceed past the screening stage: Plaintiff’s claim against Defendant Ibarra and Doe ISU Officers for excessive force in violation of the Eighth Amendment and Plaintiff’s claim against Defendants Hilario and Flowers for deliberate indifference to serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.