(PC) Kuykendall v. Superior Court of CA

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 13, 20202:20-cv-01590California743 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 RONALD KUYKENDALL, II, No. 2:20-cv-1590 KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA, et al., 14 Defendants.

16 Plaintiff, a pretrial detainee1 housed at the Rio Cosumnes Correctional Facility and proceeding pro se, filed a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983, together with a request for leave to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Plaintiff has not, however, filed a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of the complaint. See 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). Plaintiff will be provided the opportunity to submit a certified copy of his inmate trust account statement. Failure to comply with this order will result in a recommendation that this action be dismissed without prejudice. In the alternative, plaintiff may seek to voluntarily dismiss this action. Plaintiff’s

Plaintiff’s case is currently pending in the Sacramento County…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.