Thompson

(HC) Brim v. Thompson

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 12, 20202:19-cv-02284California3,183 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 BRIAN KEITH BRIM, No. 2:19-cv-2284 KJN P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

PAUL THOMPSON, WARDEN, Respondent. 16 I. Introduction Petitioner is a federal prisoner, proceeding pro se, with an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2241, claiming that his due process rights were violated. Respondent’s motion to dismiss and petitioner’s motion to amend are before the court. As set forth below, the undersigned recommends that respondent’s motion to dismiss be granted on the grounds that this court lacks jurisdiction, and petitioner’s motion to amend should be denied. II. Background In 1996, petitioner was convicted in the Central District of California of conspiracy to manufacture illicit drugs, possession of illicit drugs, and attempt to manufacture illicit drugs. Petitioner was sentenced to life in prison, and at all times herein was housed at FCI-Herlong. 28 …

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.