(HC) Turner v. People of the State of Calfornia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 12, 20202:20-cv-01370California596 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY DEWAYNE LEE TURNER, No. 2:20-cv-1370 DB P Petitioner, v. ORDER AND FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

PEOPLE OF THE STATE OF CALIF., Respondent. 16 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254 together with a request to proceed in forma pauperis pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915. Petitioner has submitted a declaration that makes the showing required by § 1915(a). Accordingly, the request to proceed in forma pauperis will be granted. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a). The exhaustion of state court remedies is a prerequisite to the granting of a petition for writ of habeas corpus. 28 U.S.C. § 2254(b)(1). A petitioner satisfies the exhaustion requirement by providing the highest state court with a full and fair opportunity to consider all claims before presenting them to the federal court. Picard v. Connor, 404 U.S. 270, 276 (1971); Middleton v. Cupp,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.