Quillen

(PC) Harris v. Quillen

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20201:17-cv-01370California1,622 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

DEVONTE B. HARRIS, ) Case No. 1:17-cv-01370-DAD-SAB (PC) ) Plaintiff, ) ) FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATION v. ) RECOMMENDING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION TO

AMEND THE COMPLAINT BE DENIED

) T. QUILLEN, et al., ) [ECF No. 72] Defendants. ) ) )

Plaintiff Devonte B. Harris is appearing pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Currently before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion to amend the complaint, filed June 29, 2020.1 I. RELEVANT BACKGROUND This action is proceeding against Defendants Sandor, Molina, Thomas and Bugarin for retaliation, and against defendants Quillen, Carranza, Alvarado, Hurtado, Perez and Magana for

1 Under the “mailbox rule,” when a pro se inmate gives prison authorities a pleading to mail to court, the Court deems the pleading constructively “filed” on the date it is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.