Diaz

(HC) Hundal v. Diaz

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20201:19-cv-00338California655 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAMANJIT SINGH HUNDAL, No. 1:19-cv-00338-DAD-JLT (HC) Petitioner, v. ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATION

RALPH DIAZ, (Doc. No. 30) Respondent.

16 Petitioner Ramanjit Singh Hundal is a state prisoner proceeding in propria persona with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On February 13, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendation recommending that the petition be denied on its merits. (Doc. No. 30.) The findings and recommendation were served upon all parties and contained notice that any objections were to be filed within thirty (30) days from the date of service of that order. (Id. at 18.) On April 15, 2020, petitioner filed objections to the findings and recommendation. (Doc. No. 33.) In accordance with the provisions of 28 U.S.C. §…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.