Horton

Horton v. Charter Communications Inc.

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20201:18-cv-01518California315 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JACK HORTON, Case No. 1:18-cv-01518-SAB

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING CLERK OF COURT

TO CLOSE CASE AND ADJUST THE

v. DOCKET TO REFLECT VOLUNTARY DISMISSAL PURSUANT TO RULE 41(a) CHARTER COMMUNICATIONS, INC., OF THE FEDERAL RULES OF CIVIL

PROCEDURE

Defendant. (ECF No. 41) 16 Jack Horton (“Plaintiff”) filed this action in the Superior Court for the State of California, County of Kings against Charter Communications Inc., Advance/Newhouse Partnership, and Bright House Networks, LLC. (ECF No. 1 at 25-27.) On November 1, 2018, Defendants Charter Communications Inc. and Bright House Networks, LLC removed the action to the Eastern District of California. (ECF No. 1.) Defendants Advance/Newhouse Partnership and Bright House Networks, LLC have previously been voluntarily dismissed from this action. (ECF Nos. 28, 32.) Charter Communications, Inc. is the sole remaining defendant. On August 14, 2020, a stipulation was filed dismissing this action with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.