(PC) Wallace v. California Department of Corrections & Rehabilitation

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20201:20-cv-00905California1,802 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM JAMES WALLACE, II, No. 1:20-cv-00905-NONE-JLT (PC)

Plaintiff,

ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

v.

RECOMMENDATIONS AND DENYING

CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF MOTION FOR TEMPORARY RESTRAINING

CORRECTIONS AND ORDER AND PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION

REHABILITATION, et al., (Doc. Nos. 4, 10, 14) Defendants. 17 Plaintiff William James Wallace is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. This matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 6, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s motion for a temporary restraining order (TRO) and a preliminary injunction (Doc. No. 4) be denied. (Doc. No. 10.) The magistrate judge found that plaintiff failed to show that he is likely succeed on the merits of his claims or that he will likely suffer…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.