(PS) King v. CA Dept. of Water Resources

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 14, 20202:17-cv-01257California337 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ELISE KING, No. 2:17-cv-1257-MCE-EFB PS Plaintiff, v. FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS CALIFORNIA DEPARTMENT OF WATER RESOURCES, et al., 15 Defendants.

17 On March 5, 2020, the court determined that service of the complaint is appropriate for 18 defendant California Department of Water Resources (“DWR”), but not for remaining eight 19 defendants. ECF No. 14. The court informed plaintiff she could proceed with her 20 Rehabilitation Act claim against defendant DWR or file an amended complaint within 30 days. 21 Id. Plaintiff has elected to proceed only with the claim against DWR. See ECF No. 16. 22 Accordingly, it is hereby recommended that plaintiff’s claims, with the exception of her 23 Rehabilitation Act claim against DWR, be dismissed without prejudice. 24 These findings and recommendations are submitted to the United States District Judge 25 assigned to the case, pursuant to the provisions of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(l). Within fourteen days 26 27 This case, in which…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.