StClair

(PC) Navarro v. StClair

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 20201:20-cv-00524California1,250 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GILBERT NAVARRO, Case No. 1:20-cv-00524-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

FILE A SECOND AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT OR NOTIFY THE COURT

OF HIS DESIRE TO PROCEED ONLY ON

J. STCLAIR, et al., CLAIMS FOUND COGNIZABLE

Defendants. (Doc. 8)

21-DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Gilbert Navarro alleges the defendants were deliberately indifferent to his serious medical needs in violation of the Eighth Amendment. (Doc. 8.) The Court finds that Plaintiff states cognizable deliberate indifference claims against the defendants in their individual capacities, but his official-capacity claims are not cognizable. Therefore, the Court directs Plaintiff to file a second amended complaint curing the deficiencies identified in this order or, in the alternative, notify the Court that he wishes to proceed only on his individual-capacity claims. I. SCREENING REQUIREMENT The Court is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.