Truillo
(PC) Casey v. Truillo
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 20201:20-cv-00560California1,063 words
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
9 JAMES ARTHUR CASEY, Case No. 1:20-cv-00560-EPG (PC) 10 Plaintiff, FINDINGS AND RECOMMENDATIONS, RECOMMENDING THAT THIS CASE BE v. DISMISSED, WITHOUT PREJUDICE, BECAUSE OF PLAINTIFF’S FAILURE
J. TRUILLO, et al., TO COMPLY WITH A COURT ORDER
AND FAILURE TO PROSECUTE Defendants. (ECF No. 14)
OBJECTIONS, IF ANY, DUE WITHIN
FOURTEEN DAYS
ORDER DIRECTING CLERK TO ASSIGN
DISTRICT JUDGE James Arthur Casey (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff filed the complaint commencing this action on April 14, 2020. (ECF No. 1). On June 17, 2020, the Court screened Plaintiff’s complaint and found that it stated a cognizable claim. (ECF No. 14). The Court gave Plaintiff thirty days from the date of service of the order to either:…