Baniga

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JOSE GARCIA, 1:19-cv-01258-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER REQUIRING PLAINTIFF TO

FILE OPPOSITION OR STATEMENT OF

v. NON-OPPOSITION TO DEFENDANT

ROLAND RODRIGUEZ’S MOTION TO

U. BANIGA, M.D., et al., COMPEL WITHIN THIRTY DAYS

Defendants. (ECF No. 23.)

17 On July 2, 2020, defendant Roland Rodriguez (“Defendant”) filed a motion to compel. (ECF No. 23.) Plaintiff was required to file an opposition or a statement of non-opposition to the motion within twenty-one days, but has not done so. Local Rule 230(l). Failure to follow a district court’s local rules is a proper grounds for dismissal. U.S. v. Warren, 601 F.2d 471, 474 (9th Cir. 1979). Moreover, when the court orders Plaintiff to respond to a motion, the court may dismiss an action for Plaintiff's failure to comply with the court’s order. See Local Rule 110; Pagtalunan v. Galaza, 291 F.3d 639, 642 (9th Cir. 2002) Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY…