Perkins

Perkins v. City of Modesto

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 20201:19-cv-00126California5,473 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 9 JASON B. PERKINS, Case No. 1:19-cv-00126-LJO-EPG 10 Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IN PART AND DENYING IN PART DEFENDANTS’ v. MOTION FOR PROTECTIVE ORDER 12 CITY OF MODESTO, et al., (ECF No. 60) 13 Defendants. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Defendants’ Motion for Protective Order (ECF No. 60). Defendants seek a protective order with respect to certain police officer personnel and internal affairs investigation (“IA”) files. For the reasons discussed below, the Court grants in part and denies in part the motion. BACKGROUND A. Allegations of Amended Complaint Plaintiff filed this civil rights action on January 29, 2019 (ECF No. 1) and filed an amended complaint on June 13, 2019 (ECF No. 22). The amended complaint alleges the following: On November 6, 2017, Plaintiff drove his significant other, Shannon Agnitsch, to the bank and waited in his vehicle, sitting in the driver’s seat in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.