Kraus

(PC) Bradford v. Kraus

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 20202:19-cv-01753California327 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAYMOND ALFORD BRADFORD, No. 2:19-cv-1753 KJM DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER PAUL R. KRAUS, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state inmate proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On April 2, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on plaintiff and which contained notice to plaintiff that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. (ECF No. 14.) Plaintiff has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Plaintiff has filed a notice of change of address (ECF No. 15), a request for copies (ECF No. 16), and a request for status (ECF No. 17). The court presumes that any findings of fact are correct. See Orand v. United States, 602 F.2d 207, 208 (9th Cir. 1979). The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.