Perez

(PC) O'Connor v. Perez

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 20202:18-cv-01057California1,441 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 GLENN O’CONNOR, No. 2:18-cv-1057 DB P Plaintiff, v. ORDER W. PEREZ, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a civil rights action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff claims defendants violated his rights under the Eighth Amendment. Presently before the court is plaintiff’s motion to compel. (ECF No. 85.) For the reasons set forth below, the court will deny the motion without prejudice. BACKGROUND This action proceeds on plaintiff’s amended complaint. (ECF No. 22.) Plaintiff alleges that he suffers from sleep apnea and has a prescribed breathing machine. (ECF No. 22 at 3.) The mask broke and he filed the required Health Care Services Request form, but did not receive a response. (Id.) He filed two more requests and still did not receive a response. (Id. at 3-4.) He alleges that defendants Perez, Nahal, Nguyen, and Dumont reviewed his requests,…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.