(PS) Nomesiri v. US Department of Education

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CHINDA NOMESIRI, No. 2:20–cv–1440–TLN–KJN PS Plaintiff, ORDER GRANTING IFP REQUEST AND

DIRECTING SERVICE

v. (ECF No. 2, 3.) U.S. DEPARTMENT OF EDUCATION, Defendants. 16 On July 17, 2020, plaintiff, who proceeds in this action without counsel, filed a complaint and requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis under 28 U.S.C. § 1915. (ECF Nos. 1, 2.) The court granted plaintiff’s IFP request, screened the complaint, and found it failed to state a claim. (ECF No. 3.) The court granted plaintiff leave to amend, and on August 12, 2020, plaintiff filed his first amended complaint (“1AC”). (See ECF No. 4.) Under 28 U.S.C. § 1915, the court must again screen the complaint to determine whether the action is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted, or seeks monetary relief against an immune defendant. As plaintiff alleged in the original complaint, he contends he submitted a “Loan Discharge 25 …