(HC)Turner

(HC)Turner v. Yolo County Court Commissioner

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 17, 20202:20-cv-01036California362 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY R. TURNER, No. 2:20-cv-1036-KJM-EFB P Petitioner, v. ORDER YOLO COUNTY COURT

COMMISSIONER,

15 Respondent.

17 Petitioner, a state prisoner proceeding pro se, has filed an application for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge as provided by 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 6, 2020, the magistrate judge filed findings and recommendations, which were served on petitioner and which contained notice to petitioner that any objections to the findings and recommendations were to be filed within fourteen days. Petitioner has not filed objections to the findings and recommendations. Although it appears from the file that plaintiff’s copy of the findings and recommendations was returned, plaintiff was properly served. It is the plaintiff’s responsibility to keep the court apprised of his current address at all times. Pursuant to Local…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.