(PC) Mariscal v. Superior Court of California County of Riverside
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
OMAR MARISCAL, No. 1:20-cv-00089-NONE-EPG (PC)
Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND
RECOMMENDATIONS, DISMISSING
v. ACTION AND DIRECTING THE CLERK
OF COURT TO ASSIGN DISTRICT
SUPERIOR COURT OF CALIFORNIA JUDGE AND CLOSE THIS CASE COUNTY OF RIVERSIDE, et al., (Doc. Nos. 13 & 15) Defendants. 16 Omar Mariscal (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On July 21, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge entered findings and recommendations, recommending that plaintiff’s claim challenging his conviction and sentence be dismissed as barred by the decision in Heck v. Humphrey, 512 U.S. 477, 486–87 (1994) and that his other claims be dismissed either because those claims are newly asserted in plaintiff’s amended 24 …