Tate
(PC) Womack v. Tate
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODNEY JAMES WOMACK, Case No. 1:19-cv-00614-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR SUPPLEMENTAL FILING
v. (ECF No. 26)
TATE, et al., ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION
FOR NEW DEADLINE TO FILE AMENDED
Defendants. COMPLAINT (ECF No. 29)
THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE
17 I. Procedural Background Plaintiff Rodney James Womack (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 20, 2019, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that Plaintiff be required to pay the filing fee in full to proceed with this action. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff did not file objections. On December 18, 2019, following a de novo review of the case, the assigned District Judge adopted the findings and…