Tate

(PC) Womack v. Tate

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 18, 20201:19-cv-00614California1,473 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RODNEY JAMES WOMACK, Case No. 1:19-cv-00614-DAD-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR SUPPLEMENTAL FILING

v. (ECF No. 26)

TATE, et al., ORDER GRANTING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION

FOR NEW DEADLINE TO FILE AMENDED

Defendants. COMPLAINT (ECF No. 29)

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

17 I. Procedural Background Plaintiff Rodney James Womack (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 20, 2019, the undersigned issued findings and recommendations that Plaintiff’s application to proceed in forma pauperis be denied pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) and that Plaintiff be required to pay the filing fee in full to proceed with this action. (ECF No. 8.) Plaintiff did not file objections. On December 18, 2019, following a de novo review of the case, the assigned District Judge adopted the findings and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.