Matevousian

(PC) Pitts v. Matevousian

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 18, 20201:19-cv-01029California368 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

EDGAR NELSON PITTS, No. 1:19-cv-01029-NONE-GSA-PC

Plaintiff, ORDER ADOPTING FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS, DENYING

vs. PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR

PRELIMINARY INJUNCTON AND/OR

ANDRE MATEVOUSIAN, et al., TEMPORARY RESTRAINING ORDER

Defendants. (Doc. Nos. 17, 21.)

16 Edgar Nelson Pitts (“plaintiff”) is a federal prisoner proceeding pro se with this civil rights action pursuant to Bivens vs. Six Unknown Agents, 403 U.S. 388 (1971). The matter was referred to a United States Magistrate Judge pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1)(B) and Local Rule 302. On June 29, 2020, findings and recommendations were issued, recommending that plaintiff’s motion for a preliminary injunction and/or temporary restraining order, filed on January 27, 2020, be denied because the requested injunctive relief would not remedy any of the alleged harms asserted in plaintiff’s claim(s) in this case. (Doc. No. 21.) The parties were granted fourteen days in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.