Algazzaly

(PC) Godinez v. Algazzaly

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 18, 20201:19-cv-01746California2,953 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 RAFAEL GODINEZ, Case No. 1:19-cv-01746-SKO (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO

FILE A SECOND AMENDED

v. COMPLAINT OR NOTIFY THE COURT

OF HIS DESIRE TO PROCEED ONLY ON

S. KERNAN, et al., CLAIMS FOUND COGNIZABLE

Defendants. (Doc. 8)

21-DAY DEADLINE

17 Plaintiff Rafael Godinez alleges the defendants subjected him to excessive force and retaliation. (Doc. 8.) The Court finds that Plaintiff’s first amended complaint states cognizable claims against Defendants Algazzaly, Gray, and Herrick, and four Doe defendants, but it does not state cognizable claims against the remaining defendants. Accordingly, the Court grants Plaintiff one final opportunity to amend his complaint. Alternatively, Plaintiff may file a notice that he wishes to proceed only on the claims found cognizable in this order and to dismiss all remaining claims and defendants. I. SCREENING…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.