Kauffman

(PC) Ramirez v. Kauffman

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 18, 20202:20-cv-01177California1,384 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 CARLOS A. RAMIREZ, No. 2:20-cv-1177 TLN DB P Plaintiff, v. AMENDED FINDINGS AND

RECOMMENDATIONS

JEFFREY KAUFFMAN, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is incarcerated at Solano County’s Stanton Correctional Facility. He is proceeding pro se with an action under 42 U.S.C. § 1983. In an order filed August 11, 2020, this court found plaintiff had not, and could not, state a claim under § 1983. Therefore, this court recommended this action be dismissed. The following day, on August 12, 2020, plaintiff’s first amended complaint (“FAC”) was filed. The FAC is largely identical to the complaint and suffers the same problems. Therefore, this court amends its previous findings and recommendations to address the first amended complaint and, for the reasons set forth below, recommends this action be dismissed. SCREENING I. Legal Standards for Civil Rights Complaints The court is required to…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.