Bugarin

(PC) Parrish v. Bugarin

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20201:19-cv-00490California3,088 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 KAHEAL PARRISH, Case No. 1:19-cv-00490-NONE-BAM (PC) Plaintiff, ORDER DISCHARGING ORDER TO SHOW

CAUSE WHY ACTION SHOULD NOT BE

v.

DISMISSED FOR FAILURE TO EXHAUST

BUGARIN, et al., (ECF No. 13)

Defendants. SCREENING ORDER GRANTING

PLAINTIFF LEAVE TO FILE AMENDED

COMPLAINT OR NOTIFY COURT OF

WILLINGNESS TO PROCEED ON

COGNIZABLE CLAIMS

(ECF No. 1)

THIRTY (30) DAY DEADLINE

20 Plaintiff Kaheal Parrish (“Plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se in this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Plaintiff initiated this action on April 15, 2019. (ECF No. 1.) I. Order to Show Cause Regarding Failure to Exhaust Prior to Filing Suit On May 31, 2019, the Court issued an order for Plaintiff to show cause why this action should not be dismissed, without prejudice, for failure to exhaust his…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.