ColfaxNet, LLC v. City of Colfax

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20202:19-cv-02167California3,680 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 COLFAXNET, LLC, No. 2:19-cv-02167-WBS-CKD Plaintiff, v. ORDER CITY OF COLFAX, (ECF No. 15) Defendant. 16 Presently before the court is defendant’s motion to compel plaintiff’s responses to written discovery, production of documents, and depositions. (ECF No. 15.) The parties have filed a joint statement regarding this discovery dispute. (ECF No. 25.) At the hearing on this matter, plaintiff appeared through Andrew M. Klein and Arthur G. Woodward and defendant appeared through Mark D. Epstein and Radhika Thanedar. For the reasons that follow, the court GRANTS defendant’s motion. I. BACKGROUND Plaintiff filed the present suit on October 25, 2019, challenging defendant, the City of Colfax’s, decision to deny its application to replace a wireless service facility. (ECF No. 1.) Plaintiff’s “tree-tower” needed to be substituted due to the tree dying, and plaintiff requested that the tower be…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.