Baughman

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 SIDNEY PETILLO, No. 2:19-cv-00667-TLN-DMC Plaintiff, v. ORDER HAINEY, et al., Defendants. 16 Plaintiff, a prisoner proceeding pro se, brings this civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the Court is Plaintiff’s motion “on consent for affirming judgment.” (ECF No. 35.) Plaintiff’s motion is roughly hand-written, contains various fragmented sentences, and is generally difficult to understand. However, the Court interprets Plaintiff’s motion as a request for this Court to reconsider its July 16, 2020 order adopting the Magistrate Judge’s June 19, 2020 findings and recommendations. In its July 16, 2020 order, the Court dismissed various Defendants from Plaintiff’s action and allowed his complaint to proceed against the remaining Defendants. Plaintiff now appears to request that the Court reconsider these dismissals. The Court may grant reconsideration under Federal Rules of Civil…