Loadholt

(PC) Patton v. Loadholt

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 19, 20202:19-cv-00451California3,389 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 ANTHONY L. PATTON, No. 2: 19-cv-0451 KJM KJN P Plaintiff, v. ORDER F.N.P. LOADHOLT, et al, Defendants. 16 Plaintiff is a state prisoner, proceeding without counsel, with a civil rights action pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Pending before the court is plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint filed June 22, 2020. (ECF No. 52.) On June 30, 2020, defendants Dhillon, Haile, Rading, Loadholt, Moon and Aguilera filed an opposition to plaintiff’s motion to amend. (ECF No. 54.) On July 2, 2020, defendant Kelso joined in the opposition filed June 30, 2020.1 (ECF No. 55.) For the reasons stated herein, plaintiff’s motion for leave to file a second amended complaint is denied with leave to file a third amended complaint. ////

On August 13, 2020, the undersigned recommended that defendant Kelso’s motion to dismiss be granted on the grounds that defendant Kelso is entitled to quasi-judicial…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.