Garcia

(PC) Dillingham v. Garcia

Good Law
United States District Court, Eastern District of CaliforniaAugust 20, 20201:18-cv-00579California387 words

Opinion

Trial Court Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT

EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA

JERRY DILLINGHAM, No. 1:18-cv-00579-NONE-EPG (PC)

Plaintiff, ORDER OVERRULING PLAINTIFF’S

OBJECTIONS TO MAGISTRATE JUDGE’S

v. ORDER

F. GARCIA, (Doc. No. 115) Defendant. 15 16 Jerry Dillingham (“plaintiff”) is a state prisoner proceeding pro se and in forma pauperis in this civil rights action filed pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. On May 28, 2020, the assigned magistrate judge issued an order denying plaintiff’s requests for appointment of expert witness, for appointment of pro bono counsel, for appointment of guardian ad litem, and to stay the case. (Doc. No. 112.) On June 29, 2020, plaintiff filed objections to that order. (Doc. No. 115.) Pursuant to Federal Rule of Civil Procedure 72(a), when reviewing a magistrate judge's order, “[t]he district judge in the case must consider timely objections and modify or set aside any part of the order that is clearly erroneous or is…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.