Gilliam
Gilliam v. O'Neill
Opinion
Trial Court Opinion
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE EASTERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA 10 WILLIAM JESSE GILLIAM, No. 1:19-cv-01711-DAD-SAB Plaintiff, v. ORDER DIRECTING PLAINTIFF TO SHOW
CAUSE WHY THIS ACTION SHOULD NOT
BARBARA HOPE O’NEILL, et al., BE DISMISSED FOR LACK OF
PROSECUTION AND FAILURE TO OBEY
Defendants. COURT ORDERS 16 17 18 Plaintiff William Jesse Gilliam is proceeding pro se in this civil rights action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983. Because it appears to the court that plaintiff has abandoned the prosecution of this action, and because he has repeatedly failed to obey court orders, the court will order him to show cause why this action should not be dismissed due to his failure to prosecute and failure to obey court orders. On December 9, 2019, plaintiff commenced this action against several defendants: attorney Barbara Hope O’Neill; the County of Fresno; Fresno County Board of Supervisors Phil Larson, Susan B. Anderson, Henry R. Perea, Judy Case McNairy, Deborah Poochigian,1…